摄像头拍到超速的罚单用交吗？

Jason莫有鱼丸

在I-95被摄像头拍到超速， 55限速开70， 罚40刀。 已经不是第一张了， 不知道这个是不是必须交的，因为有人跟我说摄像头拍到的不能作为证据，有知道的告诉下，多谢

Gabrielle-Yang

有信给你吗 有就要交吧 谁说摄像头的不算 我朋友拍了N次 不知道 没交钱 车子都被锁了 罚款吓死人好不好

paragon

必须交啊。
摄像头拍的是最舒服的了~虽然费用多点，但是不扣分不用上traffic school。

幸福晴天少爷

明明是铁证如山，，就是不知道不交的后果是什么，，

Jason莫有鱼丸

Gabrielle-Yang 发表于 2014-4-27 09:10
有信给你吗 有就要交吧 谁说摄像头的不算 我朋友拍了N次 不知道 没交钱 车子都被锁了 罚款吓死人好不好 ...

有啊 每次看到那信封就心里一惊。之前的都交了 一律40刀 比警察抓的便宜多了 不过前阵子有人说不交也没事 我就觉得不太可能 所以来问问

Jason莫有鱼丸

paragon 发表于 2014-4-27 09:46
必须交啊。
摄像头拍的是最舒服的了~虽然费用多点，但是不扣分不用上traffic school。 ...

知道了 多谢哈

Gabrielle-Yang

Jason莫有鱼丸 发表于 2014-4-27 15:21
有啊 每次看到那信封就心里一惊。之前的都交了 一律40刀 比警察抓的便宜多了 不过前阵子有人说不交也没事 ...

那就要交 否则 攒到一起会有麻烦 我们这里就是找到你车锁车

WaBu

在ohio是不用交地，　牌照只能证明是你的车，但不能证明是你在开。还有什么court loophole在ohio时uncontitutional的

As of December 2010 Arkansas, Nebraska, Mississippi, Nevada, New Jersey, Utah, West Virginia and Wisconsin have enacted various prohibitions on red light, speed or other photo enforcement camera uses.[51] Restrictions or conditions exist in additional states; the New Mexico Department of Transportation, for example, has asserted the right to restrict or prohibit red light cameras on state highways.[101] In states such as Wisconsin, the ban comes from decisions by state supreme courts declaring that the cameras were unconstitutional. While red light cameras may not be prohibited in other regions, they may have some restrictions on their use. In some jurisdictions, the law says that the camera needs to obtain a photo of the driver's face in order for the citation issued for running the red light to be valid. This is the case in California, Arizona,[102] and Colorado[51] where the red light cameras are set up to take a series of photographs, including one of the driver's face.[103] In California, state law assesses a demerit point against a driver who runs a red light,[104] and the need to identify the actual violator has led to the creation of a unique investigatory tool, the fake "ticket."[59][60][61][62] Groups opposing the use of red light cameras have argued that where the cameras are not set up to identify the vehicle driver, owner liability issues are raised. It is perceived by some that the owner of the vehicle is unfairly penalized by being considered liable for red-light violations although they may not have been the driver at the time of the offense.[5][105] In most jurisdictions the liability for red light violations is a civil offense, rather than a criminal citation, issued upon the vehicle owner—similar to a parking ticket.[106] The issue of owner liability has been addressed in the US courts, with a ruling in the District of Columbia Court of Appeals in 2007, which agreed with a lower court when it found that the presumption of liability of the owners of vehicles issued citations does not violate due process rights.[107] This ruling was supported by a 2009 7th US Circuit Court of Appeals ruling in which it was held that issuing citations to vehicle owners (or lessees) is constitutional. The court stated that it also encourages drivers to be cautious in lending their vehicles to others

不打野会死星人

都有证据了怎么可能不用交= =

Jason莫有鱼丸

bluekyy 发表于 2014-4-28 22:09
I-95是横跨西雅图的那条FREEWAY么

我在东部啊 我说的是纵跨东部的那条

__你特么在逗我

好多地方都有I-95